270 wsm vs 7mm rem mag

They’re pretty much the same thing. Like it or not. Mule Deer Cartridge Showdown: .270 Win. Just because it can be done does not mean it makes sense, despite what you might read in … Video: Why Did This Giant Black Bear Emerge from His Den So Early. Both rifles work equally as well. Cheap Rifle Ammunition including .223, 5.56mm, .270, .308 & .30-06 for your AR15, AK47 and other firearms in stock and ready to … The Roosevelt elk of Western WA tend to have smaller racks & bigger bodies than the usual Rocky Mountain elk. I'll take 110 TTSX at 3,400 in a 270 over 120 TTSX at 3,500 in my 7RM. For factory rifles a 7mm rem mag … Ballistics Comparison for 270 Rifle Ammunition from all the major brands. A 7mm Rem Mag with a 140 grain bullet has significantly more recoil than a .270 WSM with a 130 grain bullet unless you use a muzzle brake. If I was to get one gun does all for your needs, the 300 WSM would do the job. (which should be every hunter's goal). ... Did he consider the 7mm rem mag. I joined a deer lease this year and I'm hunting on a pipeline. A decently hand loaded 270 Win will out do R-P and Norma 7MM Mag rounds. Ric has a very valid point. Now I am trying to settle on a caliber. The .270 Winchester Short Magnum is part of that family of cartridges based on the .404 Jeffery, which include the Remington Ultra Magnum and Short Action Ultra Magnums; it is designed to exceed the velocities of the .270 Winchester, but in a short action rifle. Getting a 7mm WSM ballistically does not get you any advantage over a regular 7mm Remington magnum. great gun, but my only hesitation was that the ammo is … I say these three because they're the most popular ones out there and you should be able to find ammo for them anywhere (even in todays climate, there is a ton of 7mm Rem Mag … The .270 WSM wouldn't be a horrible second choice but you would have nowhere near the bullet options. I have killed elk with ,260 rem, 6.5 x 284, 270 win, 270 wsm, 7mm saum, 7mm rem mag, 300 wsm. Rifle Ammunition from all the major brands. 140 NAB's vs 160 NAB's same thing. The 7mm Remington Magnum was developed by remington and introduced to the public in 1962. I shot a 270 for years think it's one of the best deer cartridges made.I did own a 270wsm for awhile and it performed well also.I now shoot a 7mm mag . Seventy-six years after the .270 broke cover Winchester launched the .300 WSM, and a year later in 2002 Winchester unveiled the .270 WSM. 7mm Mag, not so much. I'm sorta in the same boat. Inside of 200 yards no advantage. 162's at 3K is about as good as it gets. Lbs.) Please note, the following information reflects the estimated average ballistics for each caliber and does not pertain to a particular manufact Mag. Remington’s 7mm Mag. Typically, a rifle magazine that can hold 4-5 .270 or .280 cartridges will only be able to hold 3 7mm Remington Magnum cartridges. Maybe I'm just thinking too much ( or maybe not at all)! By David E. Petzal. Mag. And It Is … I'll take 110 TTSX at 3,400 in a 270 over 120 TTSX at 3,500 in my 7RM. I'm thinking of buying a 7mm Mag or a .270 WSM. Your experience/wisdom is well taken.I appreciate your input to my decision....one of the great things about this forum is all of this experience from which to draw. Magnum, using bullets on the heavy side for their respective bore sizes, are potent against Class 3 game. Shootability Shootability describes how comfortable a caliber is to my shoulder and my wallet. loads. dezmick wrote: is i worth my time to get a 7mm wsm, i am looking at getting a browning X-bolt for hunting elk in either 7mm rem mag or 7mm wsm, the rem mag has 26 inch barrel and the wsm has 23 inch barrel would that make any difference, and i noticed that there is not as many factory loads for the wsm, but i have found a few that i know will work, and i plan … Back in 1982 I chose the 7mm RM. As a magnum cartridge, the 7mm Rem. It has so many bullet options, especially since you handload, you can hunt everything you brought up without worry. We put 3 popular cartridges to a head-to-head-to-head test I loaded up some Nosler 140 gr. I currently have both a 700 Remington and a M77 Ruger type rifles. In the same is true for the WSM. All rights reserved. Anyways, his feeling for buying new to use for both deer and moose is the 270wsm with partitions and accubonds providing the change up. Guns - .270 WSM vs .270 Weatherby - Ok, first off want to say to everyone hope you all have a Merry Christmas.Enjoy it cause we only got 2 more before . The 270 Winchester and 7mm-08 Remington cartridges are compared for velocity, power, recoil and other aspects of hunting performance. I am happy with my decision. He suggests looking at page 467 of the Sierra Manual for the 7mm WSM itself. 7mm mag vs 300 Short mag by: PB I have owned a Remington 7mm mag rifle(s) and used it almost exclusively for hunting deer, elk and moose since 1968. In my opinion, one of the drawbacks of all three of the .270s is their twist rate. Versatility, flat shooting and plenty of knockdown power. is definitely a long range rifle but if recoil is a problem it is definitely not the rifle for you. Cheap Rifle Ammunition including .223, 5.56mm, .270, .308 & .30-06 for your AR15, AK47 and other firearms in stock and ready to ship from our warehouse at Alton Place. I'm coming out of retirement and have 'clearance' for a new rifle. Once I had done the math, I was surprised at how well the 150 grain .270 WSM load kept pace with the two 7mm Rem. Lv 7. The 7mm is kind of in between, but I got a smokin good deal on it. Alaskan Coalition Seeking Permanent Protections For Bristol Bay, 14 Lightweight Hunting Rifles For Every Budget, How to Make a DIY Gun Rack for a Duck-Hunting Canoe, There’s a New Pending Record Black Crappie in California, The Beginner’s Guide to Northern Pike Fishing, Minnesota Hunter Loses Camp’s Biggest-Doe Contest...by Taking 227-Inch Drop-Tine Buck, Best Ice Cleats, Snow Spikes, and Traction Devices for Winter, How to Keep Your Sleeping Bag Warm and Dry in the Backcountry. The Roosevelt elk of Western WA tend to have smaller racks & bigger bodies than the usual Rocky Mountain elk. has a reputation for producing stiff recoil, especially in lightweight hunting rifles. There is going to be some added recoil with the 7mm Rem Mag (close to a .30-06 IMO). Since it uses a much larger case diameter, most rifle magazines will hold more .270 Winchester, .280 Remington, or .280 AI cartridges than 7mm Remington Magnum cartridges. Your shots may be shorter distance, but it is hard to make up for bullet weight. vs. .300 Win. Both the .270 and 7mm mag. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif Mag. would be fine and has taken many elk, I'd personally go for one of the popular magnums like the 7mm Rem Mag, 300 Win Mag, or 300 WSM for the added range and power. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif, I've seen plenty of elk killed with the .270. Both rifles work equally as well. Exactly why I went with 7mm. 162's at 3K is about as good as it gets. A lot of folks swear by the .270 but I personally felt it was a little light for elk hunting. John de Witt. I love that thing and am a huge fan of the .280 AI and the .280 Remington. This is truly an excellent big game cartridge for North American hunting. The 7mm Rem. your train of thougth isn't all that bad.. but look at bullets weights... the 270 bullets are relativly "light", Ric has a very valid point. I would definitely choose 7mm over 270 on game such as elk ,moose or other thick skinned game. Down range a 7-08 is right with that 270 wsm. Never felt the need for anything WSM. First, I will admit that I am not a belted case fan. Trystan Posted By: Coyote_Hunter Re: 270 wsm or 7mm rem mag - 10/27/16. As far as the discussion between the 300 short mag and the 7mm mag I think you are splitting hairs. With typical hunting factory loads, the 7mm Remington Magnum and the .280 Ackley Improved have a slight advantage over the others in this regard with a flatter trajectory and the most resistance to wind drift. Concerning the 7 mag vs the 270 WSM I'd take the one that was a great bargain in the first rifle that came along that suited my fancy. Violate this principle by, for example, chambering a lightweight, short action rifle for a powerful Magnum cartridge like the .300 WSM and the result will be a dramatic increase in kick. It drops deer in their tracks. His main concern is that the chamber reamers for the 7mm/270 WSM are all custom, each one reflecting the individual shooters ideas on design. I was most always hunting Deer when the Elk showed up. It may not display this or other websites correctly. 7mm rem mag vs 270. Take that bullet out of the equation and you've got a lot of things that are in 270'ville. Source(s): 270 wsm 7mm rem mag: https://shortly.im/wynVp. Back in 1982 I chose the 7mm RM. In summary, the .270 WSM and 7mm Rem. The first three cartridges were all designed and marketed specifically as short action alternatives to extremely popular and effective standard length cartridges: the .270 Winchester for the .270 Winchester Short Magnum, the 7mm Remington Magnum for the 7mm Winchester Short Magnum, and the .300 Winchester Magnum for the 300 Winchester Short Magnum. Mag load (168 Berger Classic Hunter) at 500 yards while only giving up 200 ft-lbs of energy (1700 vs. 1900) at the same distance. Just like with the 270 WSM vs 270 Winchester, 7mm WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag, and 300 WSM vs 300 Win Mag, the .338 Win Mag is significantly longer than the 325 WSM. Just put your shot were it needs to go. Just like with the 270 WSM vs 270 Winchester, 7mm WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag, and 300 WSM vs 300 Win Mag, the .338 Win Mag is significantly longer than the 325 WSM. I have been trying to deside between a 7mm WSM and a 270 WSM. 8 years ago. Thanks for posting the question Tikka. Winner: 7mm Rem. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/blush.gif, Thanks, Ric for the info.....I definitely understand that a heavier bullet will aid in killing power (along with a number of other variables). Mag. Just put your shot were it needs to go. Mag. Of all the WS(S)M cartridges, the .270 is the only one that is (arguably) better than the old .270. I want a gun that will be flat shooting and be … Anyone own/shoot both of these calibers and if so, which would you keep if you could only keep one for this type of hunting??? Though I like the 325 wsm, ammo availability shut the door on it for me. 0 0. I curretly have a 270 win and 300 win mag, I know another rifle is not nessasary but I want one. I have killed elk with ,260 rem, 6.5 x 284, 270 win, 270 wsm, 7mm saum, 7mm rem mag, 300 wsm. I … And the 7mm-08 Remington beats it is some comparisons. Guns and Shooting Online has compiled an extensive table comparing the recoil of many rifle cartridges and bullet weights in rifles of various weights Fishing. Either will take up to Elk size game. Mag. However, Winchester likely made an attempt at doing just that, but since the case is optimized for the 300 WSM, they probably were not getting the desired performance with a .338″ bullet and opted for a .323″ compromise instead. Yes, the elk hunting takes place in western wash state. vs. 7mm Rem. Re: 7mm mag vs 7mm wsm ?? Winchester , seeing the wisdom of the .308 Norma Magnum and an opportunity to produce a .30 caliber magnum with the Winchester moniker, extended the case length from 2.50″ to 2.62″, shortening the neck length to 0.264″ to give … It just seems to kill elk a lot better than the .270. Latest. Exactly why I went with 7mm. I've got to investigate fit/recoil pads myself more though too. Mag. The following ammunition cartridge ballistics information and chart can be used to approximately compare .270 WSM Winchester Short Magnum vs 7mm-08 Remington ammo rounds. 270 Win vs 280 Rem vs 280 AI vs 7mm Mag Ballistics. I would definitely choose 7mm over 270 on game such as elk ,moose or other thick skinned game. That's plausible. Like most ballistic and other performance specs we have looked at between the 7mm Rem Mag vs .300 Win Mag, there is not a whole lot of difference between the two cartridges. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif And they don't have a belt. A lot of folks swear by the .270 but I personally felt it was a little light for elk hunting. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. That reputation is warranted. Using 160 grain bullets it will take elk at 500 yards as well. Not a lot to choose from. RE: .270 vs. 7mm Rem Mag oldelkhunter: I looked at that 270 wsm and thought seriously about it. Trystan Posted By: Coyote_Hunter Re: 270 wsm or 7mm rem mag - 10/27/16. Comparing the .270 with the 7mm Remington magnum is like comparing grits and white cornmeal. The following ammunition cartridge ballistics information and chart can be used to approximately compare .270 WSM Winchester Short Magnum vs .300 Winchester Magnum ammo rounds. Mag. The 7mm Rem Mag is going to top out at about 3250fps with the 140gr bullet. Partitions with IMR7828SSC powder and am getting 3230 fps out of the 24" Shilen barrel on it. Hand loads tend to duplicate .280 Remington in order to extend case life. However, Winchester likely made an attempt at doing just that, but since the case is optimized for the 300 WSM, they probably were not getting the desired performance with a .338″ bullet and opted for a .323″ compromise instead. unseated the .264 Winchester Magnum rather quickly, becoming the darling of Western hunters. Caliber: Bullet Weight: Overall Cartridge Length: Muzzle Velocity: Trajectory at 300 yds(100yds zero) Muzzle Energy(Ft. It drops deer in their tracks. Field & Stream may receive financial compensation for products purchased through this site. Factory ammunition generates velocities roughly halfway between the .280 Remington and 7mm Remington Magnum. One thing to consider is the chance of hunting larger game . Contacted my hunting partner to chat ballistics. 8 years ago. Either will take up to Elk size game. Florida Has a New Invasive Species. Please note, the following information reflects the estimated average ballistics for each caliber and does not pertain to a particular manufacturer, Does the perfect muley cartridge really exist? In the 270 wsm you are burning a bunch of powder in expensive brass to push a bullet out at high velocity to have the bullet just dump it all quick. I probably hunt 80% whitetail in a mix of woods and open. The 7mm (.284) a little larger round than the .270 (.277). The 7mm Rem Mag is going to top out at about 3250fps with the 140gr bullet. I hate belted cases, and I own a 270 WSM, but I'd recommend the 7mm Remington Magnum anyway, unless there's some reason not to. Which is sort of an explanation of why I have the .300. The 300 WSM will have more recoil than you presently have, but put on a Vais muzzle brake and recoil will be like a 308. He is currently shooting a 300WM for moose but wishes he had his 7mm back. One thing to consider is the chance of hunting larger game . Those differences in the external dimensions of the .270 Winchester, .280 Remington, .280 Ackley Improved, and 7mm Remington Magnum do translate into differences in ballistic performance, though probably not quite as much as you’d initially expect. However, the distance from the case head to the datum line on the shoulder is longer for the 7WSM, preventing accidental chambering or firing of the .284" 7mm bullet in .270 WSM… As far as the discussion between the 300 short mag and the 7mm mag I think you are splitting hairs. We put 3 popular cartridges to a head-to-head-to-head test Never felt the need for anything WSM. Although the 270 Win. I have killed elk with the .270 and the .300. However, I still believe that I would be more accurate with more manageable recoil, therefore a better choice would still be between the 7 mm rem mag and something more manageable. 0 0. Why 7mm Rem Mag over the new 7mm WSM? You just have to make a good shot. The 7mm Rem Mag is a flat shooting round that is available in a good selection of bullet weights, though maybe not as many as the.300 Win Mag. 280 ackley improved vs 7mm rem mag, I just had a .280 AI built on a Winchester Model 70 controlled round feed action, very similar to the MRC rifle you are thinking about getting. Plus, the .270 WSM could poach from an already extensive lineup of .277 bullets designed for the .270 … Though I like the 325 wsm, ammo availability shut the door on it for me. Copyright © 2021 Field & Stream. He soon had the book out comparing 7mmMag and 270wsm velocities etc. It's defeating to purpose. Popularity/availability of the 7mm rem mag also seems to be greater, although that may be changing. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. The 7mm WSM is an effective and emphatic killer of medium game out to intermediate long ranges, producing best results inside 700 yards, much like the .280 Remington. For factory rifles a 7mm rem mag is hard to beat for stepping it out. I am purchasing a new rifle for big game. There is going to be some added recoil with the 7mm Rem Mag (close to a .30-06 IMO). It has so many bullet options, especially since you handload, you can hunt everything you brought up without worry. Not a lot to choose from. I also do some elk hunting mostly in wooded areas. A Bonnier Corporation Company. I have a 7mm Remington Magnum and have compared it to other rounds like the 7mm WSM or the 270 WSM. It's defeating to purpose. The .270 WSM wouldn't be a horrible second choice but you would have nowhere near the bullet options. are great cartridges, but which one is better? 7mm Remington saum 7mm WSM 300 Remington ... 240 Weatherby Mag 257 Roberts 25-06 Remington 6.5x55 Swedish 270 Winchester 7x57 Mauser 7x64 Brenneke 280 Remington 30/06 Springfield 8mm Mauser 338/06 A Square 35 Whelen Long actions with a bolt face .Dia of .540 +/-257 Weatherby 264 Win Mag 270 weatherby Mag 7mm Remington Mag 7mm Weatherby Mag … However, I'm just thinking that buying the 300wsm would be massive overkill for the deer. More The Gun Nuts. Just like when i showed up for the Buffalo hunt with my .277 The park rangers wanted a 300 mag at least and most of the guys actually had .338 and 375's. On average, the 7mm Rem Mag rounds have a SD of .279 while the .300 Win Mag rounds have an average SD of .289, a hundredth of a difference. Someone mentioned WSM cases can go for a lot of reloads. The following ammunition cartridge ballistics information and chart can be used to approximately compare .270 WSM Winchester Short Magnum vs 7mm-08 Remington ammo rounds. I currently have both a 700 Remington and a M77 Ruger type rifles. Like most ballistic and other performance specs we have looked at between the 7mm Rem Mag vs .300 Win Mag, there is not a whole lot of difference between the two cartridges. Versatility, flat shooting and plenty of knockdown power. Like the .270 Weatherby Magnum—released 60 years prior to the .270 WSM—it betters the velocity of the .270 Winchester, but I’m not certain that the increased velocity is necessarily required. For MV, the WSM load was just 10 f.p.s. Thanks again Ric! On average, the 7mm Rem Mag rounds have a SD of .279 while the .300 Win Mag rounds have an average SD of .289, a hundredth of a difference. However, if the WSMs are loaded properly they will more than do the job but ya gotta put some powder in 'em. I have a .270 Win, a 7mm Rem Mag, and a .300 Win Mag. Like it or not. When someone gave me a substantial quantity of once fired 7mm brass, I found that I had to collect size it, just to get it to chamber in my #1. Lv 7. Maybe a 308 or 7mm-08 would make sense? I'd go with the 7mm Rem Mag, even though belted cartridges are somewhat of an anachronism. ballistics. Please note, the following information reflects the estimated average ballistics for each caliber and does not pertain to a particular manufacturer, bullet weight, or jacketing type. The 7mm Rem. I was most always hunting Deer when the Elk showed up. Recoil is worse with a .300. Take that bullet out of the equation and you've got a lot of things that are in 270'ville. 140 NAB's vs 160 NAB's same thing. The 7mm WSM is similar to the .300 WSM with the case necked down to handle .284" bullets. The 7mm Rem Mag has enough power, using 140 grain bullets it will drop deer at 500 yards. slower than the 140 grain 7mm load and 150 f.p.s. If I was to get one gun does all for your needs, the 300 WSM would do the job. John de Witt. The 270 Winchester tops out at about 3050fps with a 140gr. is definitely a long range rifle but if recoil is a problem it is definitely not the rifle for you. If I were you I would be looking at a 270 WSM. But the driving force behind the shortmags could just as likely have been a mandate from marketing to dream up another neato magnum offering so they could sell more guns and ammo. Inside of 200 yards no advantage. vs. 7mm Rem. I've always used a .30-06 but pipeline hunting is a new experience compared to the short-range thick brush situations I've always hunted. Down range a 7-08 is right with that 270 wsm. Why 7mm Rem Mag over the new 7mm WSM? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif. 7mm mag vs 300 Short mag by: PB I have owned a Remington 7mm mag rifle(s) and used it almost exclusively for hunting deer, elk and moose since 1968. Mag. The math works out that this gun will produce a five-inch flatter trajectory over my 7mm Rem. The 270 Winchester is the winner in most categories, but not by a wide margin. In the 270 wsm you are burning a bunch of powder in expensive brass to push a bullet out at high velocity to have the bullet just dump it all quick. (5.1%) faster than the 160 grain 7mm load. The 7mm (.284) a little larger round than the .270 (.277). Gun Parts - Stocks, Barrels, Actions, etc. Someone mentioned WSM cases can go for a lot of reloads. You really are comparing apples and oranges. October 28, 2013. .270 versus 7mm Rem Mag. Maybe I was being optimistic in thinking that I could load up the 7 mag with a 175-180 grain bullet and take down an elk. You are using an out of date browser. Mag. I have been considering pulling the tube on my 7mm rem mag and putting a new barrel in 270 wby mag on it. Source(s): 270 wsm 7mm rem mag: https://shortly.im/wynVp. The 270 Winchester tops out at about 3050fps with a 140gr. Good luck. Many products featured on this site were editorially chosen. I shot a 270 for years think it's one of the best deer cartridges made.I did own a 270wsm for awhile and it performed well also.I now shoot a 7mm mag . vs. .300 Win. I hate belted cases, and I own a 270 WSM, but I'd recommend the 7mm Remington Magnum anyway, unless there's some reason not to. Keep in mind that this is coming from a bowhunter, so I have always been of the mind that accuracy is paramount, and power has been more or less a constant. In the WSM .270 fans found a short, powerful, efficient round that could be housed in compact, lightweight short-action rifles and which edged closer to 7mm Rem. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif. JavaScript is disabled. Mule Deer Cartridge Showdown: .270 Win. Does the perfect muley cartridge really exist? You really are comparing apples and oranges. We hunted north of you in Northwest Ontario for moose and deer, he still does. I would say the .270 is perfectly tolerable on the bench without a brake. He doesn`t know how other case capacities and throating lengths would compare to his. Not much different than your present 270. Concerning the 7 mag vs the 270 WSM I'd take the one that was a great bargain in the first rifle that came along that suited my fancy.

How To Build A Widows Walk, How Many Amps Does A 4 Ton Air Conditioner Use, Inferno De Dante, Yoshihiro Togashi 2020, How Old Is Mindi Abair, Does Uc Davis Accept Clep, New Homes In Shadowglen Manor, Tx, What Is Housing Snap,